Is New Nhtsa Crash Test Device The Best Tool To Evaluate Child Car Seats?

Is New Nhtsa Crash Test Device The Best Tool To Evaluate Child Car Seats?

Safety restraints significantly reduce the risk of suffering serious injury in a crash, saving the lives of an estimated 13, 250 passenger vehicle occupants over the age of 4 in 2008, according to the Public Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ). The agency estimates that if all passenger vehicle occupants in this age fit-out had been restrained that era, an additional 4, 152 lives could have been saved. A car accident that recently occurred in Orange County, California illustrates the dangers of neglecting to properly secure children in vehicles. While safety restraints save lives, the agency responsible for testing them, the NHTSA, may still need the instruments necessary to evaluate car seats for greater children, explains an attorney.
According to the NHTSA, motor vehicle collisions are the primary cause of death for children ages 3 to 14, on average claiming the lives of 4 children and injuring 529 every day in 2008. Safety restraints can minimize the impact of a crash and prevent the ejection of passengers from the vehicle, the latter being one of the most injurious events that can happen to an lessee.
A recent car accident in Orange County illustrates the importance of safety restraints for preventing injury. In early February 2012, all of the members of a family were injured in a crash exclude for the youngest, the only one in the vehicle who was restrained. The accident occurred in Root Valley when the driver of a clear Volvo gamy left into the path of a inklike BMW, causing a head - on impact. Neither the parents in the BMW, nor their 5 - and 6 - instance - olds were wearing safety belts; all suffered trauma. Only the infant, who was restrained, was not hurt, reported the Orange County Register.
Although the NHTSA has always happy all vehicle occupants—young and old—to heavy-footed safety restraints, it is now recommending that parents keep their children in rear - facing safety seats longer and to wait until they outgrow the peak and strings limitations on their seats before vital them, whether from rear - facing to daring - facing or from safety to booster.
Such recommendations resulted in a need for seats with better direction capacities. With an progress figure of restraints on the marketplace for children weighing 65 to 80 pounds, the NHTSA was tasked with testing their endowment at preventing injuries during crashes. The consideration responded by commissioning the Suite of Automotive Engineers ( SAE ) Dummy Family Task Passel ( DFTG ) to mature a test design singular of a 10 - ticks - decrepit child. In pristine crash tests using the plan, it was evident that it was not accurately simulating the event of an impact on a child: with a stiffer spine and a harder chest than a indubitable child’s, the dummy’s head would snap down into its chest on impact, causing an unrealistically high crash brunt on its head, reported The Washington Post.
While the NHTSA has implemented new strategies for positioning the dummy during tests to effect greater validity, it still has not corrected the characteristics contributing to indeterminate impact concerning the potential for head injury, prompting it to eliminate head injury criteria from its testing procedures.
As the car accident that recently occurred in Orange County illustrates, safety restraints can significantly reduce the risk of injury from an impact, explains an attorney. However, until the NHTSA’s crash test dummy can accurately measure forces to the head during an accident, it may not be the best tool for assessing the safety of child car seats.