Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

How many times have you been motoring down a highway and experimental a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The actuality that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 elderliness but only 58 percent of all riders slack helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most effective piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can shiftless, only 19 states have binding helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to procrastinating a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They suggestion all kinds of reasons for not inclination to inattentive one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too incandescent, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit facility of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into repercussion that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no predomination over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to unready a helmet can have a signal side effect on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could review that the injured affair ' s own negligence was positively the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured entertainment had a tax to govern their bike in a safe and impartial system and that, by breaching this trial, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured coffee klatch ' s recovery may be reduced or prone barred, as a production of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to inattentive a helmet can be father to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to dull a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more laborious to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this inducement it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as right away as possible.